Archive for the ‘Vested interests’ category

Bad decisions by government – 11c: permitting toxic chemicals in the home, in aeroplanes, in agriculture and in warfare

September 6th, 2010

Earlier the plight of organophosphate [OP] poisoned farmers and soldiers was posted on this site but others have also suffered.  

Other campaigns include those mounted about the ill-effects of the use of organochlorine compounds in cat and dog flea collars – children being particularly susceptible, the damage done to the health of pilots by organophosphorus compounds used as additives in lubricating oil used in aircraft engines and campaigns by those presenting evidence linking OPs with the BSE epidemic

China leads the way 

Five organophosphate insecticides were banned for agricultural use in China from January 1st 2007. The phase-out programme for the “high-toxicity” insecticides began in 2002. 

Influential industries want to continue using organophosphates and – like government – fear the massive compensation bills that could follow any admission of damage done.

The airline industry 

Former pilot John Hoyte, Chairman of the Aerotoxic Association, who has personally experienced the devastating effects of Aerotoxic Syndrome, writes ”We believe it is the air travel dimension of OPs that is keeping it from being admitted – millions of people being daily exposed and getting ‘jetlag’.” Peter Julu, a consultant neurophysiologist at the Breakspear clinic in Hertfordshire, said his tests on pilots with memory loss leave no doubt that they were poisoned by fumes in the air used to pressurise cabins. 

GM companies 

OP-affected farmer Brenda Sutcliffe adds that Monsanto will oppose any move against the use of OPs, as the active ingredient in their weedkiller Roundup is glyphosate, an organophosphorus compound. 

Arms industry

Chemical weapons stored on Colorado site

 

Richard Bruce wonders if the real danger of OPs is hidden so that the production lines of agrochemical plants would be available in the event of war . . . 

His surmise that such chemicals are still valued as weapons is confirmed by the report in the journal ‘Toxicology’ [Volume 233, Issues 1-3] that research into antidote development and testing, particularly with respect to organophosphorus (OP) nerve agents, was on the agenda of the Tenth International Medical Chemical Defence Conference (MCDC) 2006 “New Strategies in Medical Protection Against Organophosphorus Compounds” Bundeswehr Medical Academy Munich, Germany 26th to 27th April 2006 

China has taken the first step – when will the UK government start to withdraw organophosphorus compounds from circulation?

COMMENT

From Lancashire:

I’m not sure about the “China leads the way” bit.   Not had chance to check them all but I expect those now banned in China were already banned in the EU.  China still uses plenty including Chlorpyrifos.

A ‘Greenpeace of finance’

August 29th, 2010

Public Affairs News – MEPs: banking lobby is a ‘danger to democracy’

 

BRUSSELS: MEPs have launched a campaign urging the establishment of a ‘counter lobby’ to financial powerhouses such as international banks. More than 70 European parliamentarians have joined the call, led by French Green MEP Pascal Canfin. 

It comes in response to what is described by the campaign as the ‘danger to democracy’ of the financial lobbying industry. 

The idea for a new body, which has been likened to a ‘Greenpeace of finance’ by Canfin, is to address what is seen as the lack of a ‘sufficient counter-power’ to the banking lobby, compared with the environmental or health sectors, where many NGOs and pressure-groups seek to influence the law-making process.

The appeal, which has been signed by local, regional and national politicians from across Europe, adds that discussion of the financial industry invariably takes place within the context of the “close proximity between political and financial elites”.

Read the whole article

News from the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency

August 29th, 2010

The Alliance for Lobbying Transparency (ALT) is an alliance of civil society groups who are concerned about the growing influence of lobbying on decision-making in the UK. We believe only increased transparency can begin to restore trust in policy making and make ministers, elected representatives and officials more accountable to the public.

 Pickles Moves Against Local Authority Lobbying 

Councils are to curtail their use of lobbyists, following changes in the rules announced by Communities Secretary Eric Pickles.  All bodies that receive funding from the Department for Communities have been ordered to sever their contracts with lobbying firms. 

Pickles said “taxpayer-funded lobbying and propaganda on the rates weakens our democracy” and his statement announced that “the practice of local authorities hiring lobbyists to press-gang Government into pet funding projects” is to stop . . . 

“Local activism and localism don’t need lobbyists,” Pickles said . . . 

Read the whole article: go to the site

Bad decisions by government – 10: DFID’s privatisation of its investment arm

August 12th, 2010

The Commonwealth Development Corporation, CDC, which was set up in 1948 to improve Britain’s financial returns from its colonies, is now owned by DFID. Its website describes its work as a state-funded private equity house providing capital to invest in promising businesses with particular emphasis on sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. CDC’s brief is to contribute to long-term poverty reduction in developing countries by supporting the private sector. 

In 2004, it sold its fund management operation at a low price, to its current chief executive and other bosses who named it Actis. Actis was given a government-owned portfolio of more than £1 billion to manage and invest; in effect British taxpayers’ money was entrusted to private equity fund managers. 

Taxpayers fund large executive incomes and extravagant expenses 

Between 2003 and 2007, Richard Laing, CDC’s chief executive, saw his income rise from £383,000 to £970,000. In just one year Actis gave £65m in bonuses to its staff. Paul Fletcher, the senior partner, received £1m. Average pay for employees was on a par with those at Goldman Sachs. 

The House of Commons Public Accounts Committee report said that these were “extraordinary levels of pay in a small publicly owned organisation charged with fighting poverty”. 

Expenses claims released to Private Eye included the ‘predictable’ first class travel and expensive hotels as visits were made to businesses they funded. Detailed information was given about the substantial amounts spent on wining and dining in London, remarking that the cost of one of the least expensive feasts – a £55 breakfast – was about a month’s income for the average Indian.   

In addition to high levels of pay and expenses there has been unease about the nature or location of some private companies selected: lucrative investments were made in projects including a skin-whitening cream company, a Nigerian shopping mall and a Chinese egg producer. 

Will improvements be made by the coalition government?

At a meeting of the international development select committee at the end of July, the development minister, Andrew Mitchell, said that ‘very specific changes’ would be made to CDC, after finding some of its transactions “absolutely astonishing”. 

On page eight of a Draft Structural Reform Plan published by DFID on 27th July 2010, a review of CDC which would make it more proactive and pro-poor was listed with instructions:

i. Request CDC to develop new business plan to maximise its development impact

ii. Publish CDC’s business plan

Ideally, this organisation will be turned round, resiling from its colonial mindset and fulfilling its mission, tightening control on expenditure and making a larger proportion of taxpayer funding available to worthwhile projects ‘contributing to long-term poverty reduction in developing countries’.